The lost art of filing

Interesting article over at the Beeb (link). It discusses the concept of using a web based email system such as Gmail to store information (pictures, phone numbers etc). This certainly something I do on a regular basis. Infact if something doesn’t exist in my inbox then I am unlikely to action it. Further I have taken to sending myself emails to remind me of certain tasks and things for future reference as do others: “You want to remember something, so you send it to your mailbox.” .

However there are certain things I have noticed in such a system. This is something that people are never trained in using. Information management is an extremely complex subject, sure Google et al. can build very powerful search tools, but the searches require people to have entered the information correctly in the first place (rather akin to looking up a word in the dictionary without knowing how to spell it). For example you search for a phone-number – what do you type into the search? If the user has not entered Phone-Number in the body of the text or the full name then it could produce incorrect results. Or possibly zero results leading the user to believe that the entry was not there.

I was once researching information management and an interesting concept was discussed about electronic information management. It basically suggested that when many office tasks shifted from the real to the virtual many roles such as secretaries were no longer necessary. This was because people now had access to word processors and filing systems, yet the skills that the secretaries boasted such as filing were not ever passed on into the electronic sphere.

As I can see it much electronic information is poorly labeled and poorly organized making the task of retrieving it much more difficult. People like Google go a long way to helping us trawl through the mess, but surely effective information management and good practices must be considered.

And another

Standards complicancy:

from a PC lovr ‘Poor standards compliance: Apple’s Safari web browser often fails to render MSN properly.’

Er…..what

mac mini vs WinPC

So the netizens are restless. It seems the mac mini has caused quite a stir. There are a lot of very angry people out there furiously defending, and attacking the other side. Not a new development granted. However there seems to be fresh bile in this one, one side of the argument has always been that macs are too expensive. This with the advent of the mini seems to have deflated that argument somewhat.

Now what we get are the bare bones of the face-off. PC users with a fair amount of anger are slating the mini as a poor option, mostly due to the specs of the system. ‘But Dell ships a 2.6 GHZ machine for the same price! And a monitor is included.’ Blah de blah.

I myself am/was a PC user, yet many of my interests (Design – Product and Graphic, Datamining, Usability, IxD and HCI) have been progressively dismissed by Windows as not the most important part of what they are trying to achieve. Fair enough. But it is that exact reason I have now moved to the Mac. It is simply a delight to look at, use and create on.

I know I have made the correct decision when one of the battling netizen uses the below as an argument for PC’s.

‘or I could grab an equally stylish, full-featured eMachine….with the added benefit of being able to run Windows XP’

I just feel my creativity may be stiffled by the above piece of product design.

Are you nerdier?


I am nerdier than 43% of all people. Are you nerdier? Click here to find out!

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2017 2016 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004