Let’s not confuse the medium with a format or system yeah?

Just saw this in the ‘From the Blogs’ section of the Grauniad Review. It references and then rips apart a blog post based on an article from the Times suggesting that ‘Internet book piracy will drive authors to stop writing’.

Book piracy on the internet will ultimately drive authors to stop writing unless radical methods are devised to compensate them for lost sales.

This is the bleak forecast of the Society of Authors, which represents more than 8,500 professional writers in the UK and believes that the havoc caused to the music business by illegal downloading is beginning to envelop the book trade.

*sigh*

When oh when will many of the internet bashers make the rather simple realisation that they are arguing about the death of formats or systems or revenue streams not the death of mediums. I really don’t think it is helpful to suggest people will stop writing or making music. Sure some will (maybe because renumeration is more important than self-expression??), but you know what, there will be an army of others to happily replace them. Ones armed with the relevant tools to make it in an interconnected world.

Just as I will not tune in to Radio 2 on a crystal set, choosing streaming over the internet instead. Writing will not die, music will not die, radio will not die, television will not die, art will not die, humour will not die. It will just move into something else – just as the way people distribute and get re-enumerated will transform.

Large volume encyclopedias may die (abeit for cosmetic purposes), cd’s may die (again abeit luxury formats), radio sets may die, tv stations may die, programming schedules may die, some publishers ay go out of business, some record labels may go out of business, some newspapers may go out of business.

DO NOT CONFUSE THIS WITH THE MEDIUM ITSELF DYING!! (sorry, for the internet shouting)

And I think I have a clue why writing will not die. The article talking about the death of writing, is….wait for it….written! Ee gads! Inherent post-modern feedback-loop?? (i.e. trying to prove a concept by saying it over and over, it MUST then be true, irrelevant of it’s own self-destructing argument – or something similarly oblique and Baudrillard-esque )

“It’s hitting hardest the writers who write books that you dip in and out of: poetry, cookbooks, travel guides, short stories – books where you don’t have to read the whole thing.

Now I am sorry, but when was it a god given right that certain formats such as the travel guides and cookbooks must survive. If the internet does it better and for free then that’s the situation, deal with it and adapt. Recipes existed for free for quite some time before Mrs Beeton. I get most of my recipes and food info from some great websites that seem to be doing rather well, okay maybe not paid great, but that doesn’t appear to be stopping them.

I agree there is an issue with how to sustain business models in the face of the most efficient distribution mechanism ever seem, but I may be naive but I am not too sure I care (or more accurately think, then adapt, the internet is not going away). The internet seems to be making many millions of peoples life’s richer beyond money. And let’s face it the last ten/twenty years of insane monetary growth seems to have mostly gone to a very small % of people or shareholders, so I find the argument that this may not continue a little meek. Especially as with the music industry they try to use the doomsday suggestion that unless you keep the current business model in existence then the entire medium will die.

Yes piracy is an issue (kind of always has been arrrrrrr), but you know if you allow people the tools to enable usage and payment for content, some of them might just pay you (and some won’t, again as they always have with cassette tapes, borrowing books, second hand books etc. and etc.). We can then make sure that money goes to the people that deserve it most, the creators, not the systems or trying to prop up formats that are really just not going to survive.

But we can’t pay for what doesn’t exist or is in a crappy format (DRM’d bloatware).

Right, feel better now.

Some more book covers….

Some more book covers I have recently designed

After Atheism by Mark Vernon
Blurb: The broadside against religion launched by a new breed of evangelical atheists has generated much heat but little light. Locked in battle against their Christian opponents the argument goes nowhere fast, and in an age of extremism, nurtures the dangerous vice of intolerance.

After Athesim

The History of Science Fiction by Adam Roberts

Blurb: The first comprehensive critical history of SF for thirty years, this book traces the origin and development of science fiction from Ancient Greece, via its rebirth in the seventeenth century, up to the present day.

History of Science Fiction

One more book cover

Forgot this one

Brook

…..also the details of all the books:


The Prehistory of Cognitive Science

Andrew Brook

Nuclear Or Not?
David Elliott

New Frontier of Religion and Science

John Hick

Science, Religion, and the Meaning of Life

Mark Vernon

Adieu Derrida
Costas Douzinas

Marketing Management
Pierre-Louis Dubois, Alain Jolibert and Hans Mühlbacher

Philosophy of Friendship
Mark Vernon

Book covers

Every so often I am asked by the company I work for to design some of book covers. I really enjoy this as it’s print and not web, so a little different. I sometimes feel that web design has gotten a little samey. I think there are some excellent, excellent designs out there, but most seem to be very grid-like, centred, header, main content, left/right nav, footer (yes somewhat like this site – I am just as guilty). Anyway here are some jackets I have designed:

Book covers

2019 2017 2016 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004